Which of these three looks like the most effective and efficient method for safe-guarding your oh-so-meticulously dressed pixels from desperate wannabes? *snort*
Three Shields
If you picked C, the Anti-Inspection Shield on the right, you’d be absolutely…WRONG! Yet, some fashionistas (and, in this case, I use that term loosely) will pay upwards of L$500 to protect their signature copybotted personal style.

I’m not going to lecture you about the disservice you are doing to the designers and content creators whose styles you wear and who, more than anything, depend upon old-fashioned word-of-mouth advertising to grow their SL business. We all know that you paid for the clothes on your back, you didn’t sign on to be their personal sales force.  Though, I’m sure, more than a few would be very appreciative if you told a few people about your favorite shops and didn’t come off like a pompous ass when someone asks where you found that cute skirt. But, I digress…

What I am going to tell you about is the massive effect you have on everyone you come in contact with, from both a practical and a technical standpoint. First, the practical. Imagine shopping in a relatively small store.  Some holier-than-thou primtard struts in wearing a huge, egg-shaped, 255 prim behemoth of an anti-inspection shield and stands right in front of the vendor you wish to purchase from. Two things will happen. First, depending on how small the store is, your camera is going to go all wonky causing a tunnel-vision effect because it can’t “see” around the prim.  Secondly, without some serious camming maneuvers, what should be a simple right-click-buy shopping experience becomes an exercise in camera gymnastics as you try to maneuver around the huge shield just to get to the vendor.  Who has time for that kind of frustration?

From a technical standpoint, anti-inspection shields cause lag.  The image below illustrates Codie’s statistics when I was wearing the shield and when I took it off.  We only measured client lag for this test, but look at the change! When I was wearing the shield Codie experienced a 90% drop in performance as measured by FPS.  Just to make sure we weren’t losing our minds, we invited Jacek Antonelli, the mastermind behind the Imprudence Viewer project, to visit and confirm our findings. She did. She also told me what hair I was wearing in under 2 seconds, I’ll share her protip for making the inspection shield completely useless in just a bit.

anti-inspect

While discussing the reasons the camera goes crazy, my brilliant friend, Caer Balogh, mentioned the bounding box, so we dug a little deeper into that subject. According to Caer, “The bounding box is the first crack the system has at finding collisions and visible stuff, if it sees the bounding box it has to do more work to tell what it needs to draw/bump into.” See the photo below.  Look at how the bounding box further expands the size of the shield. “Bear in mind, it’s all like ARC,” she continued, “you may not cause lag with a large bbox, but it may be an indicator that you’re making things work harder.” Caer has a couple of great pictures of shield failures on Flickr in her Anti-Inspection Shield Theatre set.

bounding box

I’m going to put this request out to sim and store owners: Ban these devices from your businesses. They do cause lag. They do suck resources. And they greatly diminish other residents’ ability to enjoy their experience. We are giving you the proof. Do not tolerate them.

So far, we’ve learned that not only are Anti-Inspection Shields a nuisance, they negatively impact other residents. Now, let’s make them completely ineffective. There are two ways to do this. The first, alt+click on a nearby prim to focus your camera just to the side or above the offending avatar, use your camera controls (From the main menu, choose View > Camera Controls if you don’t have them open already) and maneuver your camera inside the sea of invisiprim layers until you can right click+inspect any prim object the avatar is wearing.  With some practice, you can identify every piece attached to their pixels in under a minute.  Jacek shared the second method. From the Advanced Menu, choose Rendering and Hide Selected. According to Jacek, “That makes it so any object you select in edit mode is invisble, and you can also click through to stuff behind it. Really useful when building, you can use it to get at inner parts.”  Once you’ve turned on the Hide Selected option, open up your build/edit dialogue (ctrl+3), click on the shield to select it, then click again on whatever attachment you want to see. It only takes two clicks to render this monstrosity completely useless.

Moral of the story:  Be a good neighbor. Who cares if someone wants to know what you are wearing. Consider it a compliment that someone appreciates your personal style. Don’t waste my time, patience and technical resources to protect your vanity. That’s not attractive, it’s pretty fucking rude.

Special thanks to CodeBastard Redgrave, Caer Balogh and Jacek Antonelli for their input, insight and intelligence.  They really helped me to understand this topic better, and I hope you learned a few things as well.

And that great dress I’m wearing on the home page? It’s new from FakE by Dream Resistance and Sabina Takakura, a new design team with a brand new store…check them out, but leave your inspection shield at home, k?

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, September 17th, 2009 at 8:53 am and is filed under Atomic Valley, Op/Ed, Rant. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

33 Comments(+Add)

1   Anna Donner    http://annabelladonner.wordpress.com
September 17th, 2009 at 10:03 am

Great article! I don’t quite understand why anyone would be insecure enough to want one of these things. On the (rare) occasions anyone asks what I’m wearing, I am flattered.

2   kesseret    http://metavirtual.us
September 17th, 2009 at 10:52 am

Why does it take so many prims to cover your ass in a ball? I want to know what idiots buy this for any legit reason!

I want to wear the ghost thing though, for real, that is SLICK.

3   Gabby Panacek    http://monkey
September 17th, 2009 at 11:02 am

Kess, I’ll find you the LM for the ghost, I bought it two Halloween’s ago and still love it!

4   Tristan Micheline    http://randomlyconfuzzled.blogspot.com/
September 17th, 2009 at 11:13 am

Great post. I’ve noticed that most of the people wearing these anti-inspect shields usually don’t have on anything I’m particularly interested in seeing myself in so I’m always wondering what’s the point. Also that usually someone in the vicinity of said person there si someone wearing something similar.

5   Is    http://www.brokebypayday.blogspot.com/
September 17th, 2009 at 11:27 am

Kesseret, the layer upon layer upon layer of prims are meant to foil you from camming in. They certainly make it difficult, but not impossible. I walked into a store where the CSR for that store was wearing anti-inspect, which is quite possibly the most asinine thing ever. It took me a few minutes, but I got around her damn shields (yes, two of them!) and made a list of everything she was wearing. (Since they overlapped I had to go inside her head and legs to get the creator for the hair and boots. Good thing I have a black belt in cam fu!) I put the pic up on my Flickr stream here http://www.flickr.com/photos/isabeaureinard/3929343082/.

The worst is when people use them to hide the fact that they’re wearing stolen items. Whenever I see someone wearing one of these things, I’m compelled to inspect everything they’re wearing, and occasionally you do find ripped hair. The oddest thing is, most of the people I’ve seen wearing these things are either Plain Janes wearing nothing special, or $5 hookers in $10 outfits.

I had no idea how much lag they cause. It makes sense, considering the amount of prims and scripts at work. What some consumers don’t understand is that the scripts inside only work if you left-click on the person, or right click and select touch. You don’t get an IM from the orb if you inspect someone. Seems like it defeats the purpose.

Also, when these things first came out, I saw them as high as L$699 on xstreetsl. Now that there are so many versions, they can be found for only L$10. It makes me sad that they’re so common that the price has plummeted.

Personally, I’m happy to tell you what I’m wearing. I don’t wear things from creators I wouldn’t recommend. However, if you know how to go about finding out yourself, that saves me some typing :)

6   Gabby Panacek    http://monkey
September 17th, 2009 at 11:39 am

Good points, Is. I should point out that the shield I wore for this post did not contain any scripting, only 255 layers of sculpted invisiprims. Of course, this one cost less than L$50 (it might even have been free, I grabbed 2 from xstreetsl and one was free). I wonder what the resulting lag effect might have been in one of the scripted monsters! o.O

7   Is    http://www.brokebypayday.blogspot.com/
September 17th, 2009 at 11:59 am

Holy shit! That much lag from prims alone? Good god. Now I really want to rain violence down upon anyone who wears those things.

8   Moira Stern    
September 17th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

While I’ve not run into these personally yet (thank heavens), it kinda seems pointless to me to even use one. Why bother getting fancy clothing, skins, etc, if you’re just going to hide it behind an annoying digital burkha?

9   Isabeal Jupiter    http://isabealjupiter.blogspot.com
September 17th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

FYI: Anti-Inspection Shields are Bad

10   Gabby McCullough    
September 17th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

Anytime I run across anyone wearing one of these, my first thought is “what a tool”. My second thought is to want to IM them and tell them what a tool they are.
Now that I know what kind of lag they are causing…I think I will tell them in open what a tool they are.

11   Callie Savira    
September 17th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

First love this article. Wanted to point out there’s another silly use for the scripted versions or the one a male friend bought. He discovered that it will tell you who has clicked on you. He’s only interested in that reason. LOL Will definitely advice him to trash it. Get enough of these on a sim and it’s toast! Yikes!

12   Iris    
September 17th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

Hm.. ok. So what.. i am one of the Idiots that are wearing one of them.. and its even scripted and tells me who is clicking on me.. but i am always standing outside the store and am shopping with my cam for not standing to someone in the way.. yes i dont want to tell where i am have my items from.. so what? And its not cause they are ripped off… i just dont want to have twins running around..i am really visiting many shops and i am reading fashion blogs.. are you too idle to read the fashion blogs? i share.. but not with anyone and not for newest Items.. for some ppl its eaqual if 10 ppl are standing around them with same Hair.. but not for me.. so what? thats why i am an Idiot? ok.. then i am one .. or perhaps is the one an Idiot who is trying minutes and makes Cam Acrobatic to look under it.. i was looking for the Lag Settings.. and this Prims are not causing more Lag as scripted 255 prims Hair… so stop talking about it only cause you are offended that you cant have that Item the person is wearing or cause you was trying frustrating minutes to look under it..

13   Caliburn Susanto    http://chateaudetuite.ning.com
September 17th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

Good for you. Exposing this kind of nonsense educates the Resident population and hopefully reduces the amount of garbage lag we all have to endure from the uninformed and just plain inconsiderate.

(I have issues with the “I don’t give a damn if it lags you or not I only care how I look” crowd. Can you tell?) ;-D

14   seren dawes    
September 17th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

Callie – lol, let your friend know that the emerald viewer does the same thing – no horrible shields required. I’ve seen a few of these shields out in clubs and they astound me. I was pretty certain they’d have much to do with craptastic performance but had no proof – thanks, Gabby for this.

15   Shattered    
September 17th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

Funny enough, the one time I’ve actually seen one on the grid, the chick was wearing copybotted shoes and hair – ones that she copybotted herself, no less.

Iris, I can respect differing opinions, but the moment you used the “shut up, you’re just jealous!” excuse, you lost what little credibility you had.

16   Codie    http://codebastard.com
September 17th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

Actually Iris, wearing 255, or even 75, layers of invisiprim OVER your whole avatar is MUCH worse on lag than any quantity of normal, half invisible prims worn on the head. We did the tests. The problem is actually that the viewer’s OpenGL renderer tries to compute a large quantity of successive, alpha-textured layers. This is not the case for hair. So, feel free not to believe it, we did a large amount of tests, also brought Jacek to investigate since she is actually a viewer programmer, and these are the end results. As for your personal reasons to wear it, it’s fine if you believe they are even remotely effective. However, they have an actual impact on people around, much greater than what you suggest. Also, I didn’t hear Gabby complain she had any difficulty actually inspecting anything on people wearing those. It takes 2 seconds. They are a nuisance because they cause massive lag and have huge bounding boxes, preventing some people from shopping. Good if you wear it responsibly, I’m happy if you do. But most people actually don’t. If you really want to wear some kind of shielding, as Seren just suggested, the Emerald shield at least doesn’t lag everyone around you to death.

17   TossThis    
September 17th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

All of you, get a real graphics card and a real computer. Stop running SL on a laptop.

If your FPS goes in the mud, its not the prims doing it.

18   Gwyneth Llewelyn    http://gwynethllewelyn.net/
September 17th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

This just shows I have no clue about fashion lol. In my days, you used clothes to show them (and yourself) off. Now it seems that the fashion is to wear a technological version of the burka. I’m sorry, I completely fail to see the point to dress up in your unique style and then run around SL completely covered from prim hair to prim toe :)

In my old-fashioned dictionary, “vanity” meant showing off how good you look, not covering yourself up so that nothing can be seen :)

Seriously, with 3 billion different items to select in SL, surely you have plenty of choices?…

Well, I guess this goes the way of tin-foil hats — or anti-copybot devices that spam the chat with “!quit” every other second and only have one purpose: making their creators rich :) There is one born rezzed every minute…

19   Codie    http://codebastard.com
September 17th, 2009 at 8:25 pm

To the last commenter, very smart. The test machine I used is a Dual-core Athlon 2.8Ghz, 4 Gigs of DDR3 RAM, with a Nvidia 8800GT – 512 megs of RAM. Good try tho. Also, great consideration for people that can’t afford a more recent computer. Way to go.

20   Colleen Criss    http://colleencriss.wordpress.com/
September 17th, 2009 at 8:29 pm

Thank you Codie and Gabby !!

21   Last Escape    
September 17th, 2009 at 9:00 pm

this is old knowledge though. I mean it’s good for people that don’t know but the person who guessed your hair in 2 seconds is no “pro” this is stuff i knew back in 2005 and anyone could do navigate inside. How old is the person who claims to have so much knowledge about this and arc, they are totally wrong in terms of the lag issue. Like when I start wearing tons of stuff that’s going to lag others but works fine for my dual 300 series cards, that’s not my fault other people suffer cause they didn’t upgrade, and I shouldn’t downgrade my avatar when I have am using the newest tech all the time. FUck the other residents.

22   Jacek Antonelli    http://tentacolor.com
September 17th, 2009 at 10:21 pm

Great post, Gabby! I’m glad I could lend my knowledge to help put these nuisance shields to rest. I’ve also made my own blog post with snapshots to fully illustrate the technique for bypassing the shields. Yay, pictures!

23   Exuberance    
September 17th, 2009 at 11:14 pm

Thanks for the great article. These shields are so ridiculous.

And all I can say to Last Escape is “Stay Klassy!”

24   msrobbiani    
September 18th, 2009 at 1:10 am

What hair is Gabby wearing in that picture with the fps stats? I want!

25   N. Lykin    
September 18th, 2009 at 1:12 am

I take it as a challenge whenever I see one… It’s fun IMing the person and telling them where their stuff is from and see ‘em TP out asap. It’s a piece of cake getting through those things to me. :p

26   Caliburn Susanto    
September 18th, 2009 at 1:42 am

One wonders how incredibly childish and insecure the person sitting at the computer has to be to actually get emotionally upset because someone has an avatar that looks like theirs. (lol) It boggles the mind. Talk about lack of perspective.

And laughing with Codie. I have a similar machine with a QUAD processor and 7.5GB RAM yet people still tell me to shut up and get a better machine. The first thing out of the mouth of a lagger is “get a better computer, jerk” (the second thing out of their mouth is usually “ARC Nazi!”). They have no concept of personal cache vs. everyone else’s cache, the overhead of distribution, or how the system works period, not to mention no consideration for others.

But really I suppose all of that is moot. The real issue is how pathetic it is to want to conceal who made what you are wearing because you think you are special. That’s just sad. You’re a CARTOON for god’s sake. Get a grip.

27   Lore Lamont    
September 18th, 2009 at 5:49 am

I hate the moments when I arrive in a club and see someone with the same hairstyle I am wearing, or the same dress, but…hey…my inventory offers enough possibilities to switch and have a different look in less than 2 minutes…it would take far longer in RL.

And I found a lot of great designers just by inspecting items worn by others. We are all walking ad-boards in a kind of way and if people start to copy the way you are dressing…just take it as a compliment!

My dear friend Lauren Weyland recently blogged ( http://laurenweyland.blogspot.com/2009/09/have-you-noticed.html )about the ongoing increase of unscocial behaviour in SL and I find some really true words in this….like accusing others not to use the most-up-to-date PC or encapsuling in your own vanity. (and you may curse me, cause I dont know how to properly embed a link ;)

28   Gabby Panacek    http://monkey
September 18th, 2009 at 7:01 am

@msrobbiani Both hairstyles used in this blog are by Truth Hawks of Truth. The one in the pic with the stats is Gabby in Coffee. (It’s my favorite hair, for obvious reasons)

29   Nimil Blackflag    http://nimil.inworld.sl
September 18th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

yuck i hate these things! i got into a big argument a few months back about this because a friend of mine started wearing one of these. she didn’t want people buying stuff she wore which personally i find to be insulting as a creator, and slightly hypocritical, since she engages in inspect shopping all the time.

to the person that mentioned the emerald viewer has this without any prims, that’s incorrect (thankfully) the only shield it does have keeps people from being able to rip off the textures of your clothing, it does not keep people from being able to inspect you.

30   Jon Nielsen    
September 24th, 2009 at 12:17 am

I wouldn’t use one of these, but I had someone use cryo to copybot me.

it was the weirdest thing and I’m pissed because I made my shape

31   SkinnyEmoChiq    
October 21st, 2009 at 10:19 pm

I Bought One Just To Piss Off My Friends HELLA LAG! MADE ME CRASH WASTE OF 500L! But Funny >=)

32   Ganymedes1985    http://ganymedescostagravas.wordpress.com
October 28th, 2009 at 11:53 am

Great article indeed! I wish a lot more people would read this because I encounter more and more people wearing them…

33   Dru    
October 28th, 2009 at 10:38 pm

the new Emerald viewer has a Derender function on the pie menu. So disabling these monstrosities is as easy as right-click Derender….. Gone from your viewer till relog!
BTW can those who defend their right to wear these things please post their full name? I’m just updating the estate ban lists……..

6 Trackbacks/Pings

  1. Anti-Inspection Shields are Bad « iheartsl.com Second Life’s largest community blog    Sep 17 2009 / 12pm:

    [...] thing, I urge you to read Gabby Panacek’s recent blog about anti-inspection devices, Just Say No.  Not wanting to rehash her entire argument, let me just say, anti-inspection device = bad.  As a [...]

  2. Jewelry Fair Starts September 18! « More than Meets the Eye    Sep 17 2009 / 12pm:

    [...] tools or other gadgets) at home.. you can buy pretties at the fair, ya know. And get rid of the anti-inspect shields… really… jewelry fair is not about you or your fabulous outfit… people come for [...]

  3. Couture Conundrum » Blog Archive » You’re So Vain…    Sep 17 2009 / 6pm:

    [...] Atomic Valley, about the price of vanity. A pretty performance penny paid, not by the wearers of Anti-Inspection Shields, but by everyone in their [...]

  4. SLink » Blog Archive » Interesting article about anti-inspect shields    Sep 17 2009 / 7pm:

    [...] Click hear to read about the effects of these shields on yourself and other people and please think … [...]

  5. Anti inspection shields cause lag « No where Now here    Sep 18 2009 / 8am:

    [...] cause lag September 18, 2009 Over on Atomic Valley Gabby Panacek has written a piece on Anti inspection shields which illustrates clearly how they cause lag. She states “We only measured client lag for [...]

  6. Anti-Inspect Shield | what’s the point? | .Ana Lutetia.    Oct 10 2009 / 5pm:

    [...] Panacek wrote an amazing article about it and the lag effects of this *amazing* device: Just Say No! and Jacek Antonelli shows how to bypass the device: Bypass an Anti-Inspect Shield in 3 Easy Steps [...]

Leave a reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment